For enforcing security measures in remote work, what authentication actions might trigger additional verification requirements?

The correct choice involves using blocklisted IP addresses and new devices as triggers for additional verification requirements. When security measures are enforced in remote work settings, organizations often implement risk-based authentication, which assesses the risk level of access requests.

Access from a blocklisted IP address indicates that the origin of the request has been identified as potentially insecure or malicious. Additionally, accessing the system from a new device introduces uncertainty about the legitimacy of the login attempt. This combination of factors prompts the need for stronger authentication, such as multi-factor authentication (MFA), to ensure that the individual making the request is authorized to access organizational resources.

In contrast, other options focus too narrowly on specific scenarios. Only new device access does not consider the broader threats posed by using a known insecure IP. Impossible travel, while a relevant security concern, does not encompass other important triggers for verification. Normal access procedures typically do not invoke additional security measures since they are considered standard and secure access methods. Therefore, the correct action, involving risky combinations, serves as a comprehensive approach to maintain security in a remote work environment.